The selection committee for the Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize is pleased to announce the shortlist for the 2022 prize, as voted on by AIPEN members.
0272
The selection committee for the Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize is pleased to announce the articles nominated by AIPEN members for the longlist for the 2022 prize.
0287
We are pleased to announce that nominations are now open for the 2022 Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize. This is the seventh annual prize for the best article published in the broad field of International Political Economy (IPE) by [...]
0159
The Prize Committee is delighted to announce that the article by Melissa Johnston, “Frontier finance: the role of microfinance in debt and violence in post-conflict Timor-Leste,” published in the journal, Review of International Political Economy has won the 2021 Australian International [...]
0428
The selection committee for the Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize is pleased to announce the shortlist for the 2021 prize, as voted on by AIPEN members. The prize will be awarded to the best article published in 2020 (online [...]
0408
The selection committee for the Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize is pleased to announce the articles nominated by AIPEN members for the longlist for the 2021 prize. The prize will be awarded to the best article published in 2020 [...]
0536
We are pleased to announce that nominations are now open for the 2021 Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize. This is the seventh annual prize for the best article published in the broad field of International Political Economy (IPE) by [...]
0274
I begin with George Lawson’s own admission in his book, Anatomies of Revolution, in footnote 10, page 88, that “[T]he story of women and revolution is not, on the whole, well told…” and that, “to its detriment, [is] no better in this regard”. Indeed, the book does contribute to the analytic [...]
0436
