nav-icons nav-icons
Progress in Political Economy (PPE) Progress in Political Economy (PPE)
LOGIN REGISTER
LOGIN
REGISTER
linklink
  • Home
  • About
  • Manchester University Press Book Series
  • Past & Present Reading Group
  • A Political Economy of Australian Capitalism
  • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • JAPE Issues
    • JAPE Submission Guidelines
    • JAPE Young Scholar Award
  • Australian IPE Network (AIPEN)
  • Forums
    • Forums
    • Debating Anatomies of Revolution
    • Debating Debtfare States
    • Debating Economic Ideas in Political Time
    • Debating Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India
    • Debating Social Movements in Latin America
    • Debating The Making of Modern Finance
    • Debating War and Social Change in Modern Europe
    • Feminist Global “Secureconomy”
    • Gendered Circuits of Labour and Violence in Global Crises
    • Scandalous Economics
    • The Military Roots of Neoliberal Governance
    • Politicising artistic pedagogies
  • Literary Geographies of Political Economy
  • Pedagogy
    • Five Minute Honours Theses
    • Piketty Forum
    • Radical Economics Pedagogy
    • Unconventional Wisdom
    • Journal Club
    • Marxism Reading Group
  • Wheelwright Lecture
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Links
    • Political Economy At Sydney
    • PHD in Political Economy
    • Master of Political Economy
    • Centre for Future Work
    • Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ)
    • Climate Justice Research Centre (UTS)
Critical Political Economy Early Career Scholar Writing Workshop
Previous
11th AIPEN Workshop: Programme and Registration
Next

Podcast: Michele Chihara on ‘Behavioral Economic Masculinity’

by Melinda Cooper on December 19, 2019

Podcast: Michele Chihara on ‘Behavioral Economic Masculinity’

Melinda Cooper | December 19, 2019

Tags: finance
finance
| 0 334

In August of this year, Los Angeles-based scholar Michelle Chihara delivered a keynote lecture on “The Rise of Behavioral Economic Masculinity” at the University of Sydney as part of the ongoing FutureFix Asset Economy project.

With a hybrid background in journalism, creative fiction and literary theory, Chihara has played a unique role in communicating the importance of economic discourse across the boundaries of genre and audience. Based at Whittier College, Los Angeles, Chihara is section editor of the celebrated Economics and Finance pages at The Los Angeles Review of Books, which has now become required reading for anyone with a critical interest in the subject, and coeditor of the field-defining Routledge Companion to Literature & Economics (October 2018).

Chihara is currently working on a book manuscript on behavioural economics— a genre of economics that straddles the boundaries between academic subfield, public policy discourse and popular journalism.

As recounted by Chihara, “behavioral economics emerged as a specific response to debates within the academic discipline of economics about the theories that grounded the study of choice and human behavior in society. The (arguably) heterodox discipline reoriented the epistemological foundations of neoclassical economics, specifically in relation to its theory of the subject. To oversimplify the public-facing versions of these arguments, the neoclassical model relied on assumptions about rational economic agents coordinated by efficient markets over time, while behavioral economics asserted that the “invisible hand” of the market was irrational but could be nudged towards reason.”

Rather than focusing on behavioral economics itself, Chihara’s research traces a cultural history of the behavioral economic narrative mode as it entered popular American discourse. “In this mode, friendly masculine explainers tell stories about the economy, or, the behavior of characters in stories is explained as fundamentally motivated by the same kind of decision-making that governs the economy. This mode colonized American popular narratives in the years around the 2008 financial crisis. The hegemonic financial explainer Michael Lewis, in his multiple bestselling books about the world of high finance, wrote the dominant popular narratives about the arrival of big data (Moneyball), the financial crisis (The Big Short), and the rise of behavioral economics (The Undoing Project). In his work, in the movie of The Big Short based on his book, in podcasts and in the context of this cultural production, I analyze the epistemological consequences of the friendly explainers’ representation of the world and the narrow horizons of the behavioral economic mode.”

A podcast of Michele’s keynote can be found here:

Set image: Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, the psychologists behind behavioural economics, who are the focus of Lewis’ The Undoing Project. Credit: Penguin Random House

Share this post

  • Tweet
  • Share Post:

Author: Melinda Cooper

Melinda Cooper is Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Sydney. She is author of Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism (Zone 2017) and coeditor, with Martijn Konings, of the Stanford University Press book series Currencies: New Thinking for Financial Times. She is currently working on two projects, one on public debt, taxation and spending and the other on the economic politics of the far right.

Related Posts

 

Can divestment save us?

In recent years, the climate movement has adopted a strategy of pressuring institutions to divest from their holdings of fossil fuel related shares. Divestment is certainly an e...

 

Dick Bryan, ‘Cryptocurrencies as units of account: possibilities for a postcapitalist, distributed mode of measurement’

Political Economy Seminar

Cryptocurrencies as units of account: possibilities for a postcapitalist, distributed mode of measurement

Presenter: Dick Bryan

Da...

 

Valuation is political

In the right-wing backlash against environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing, everyone is accusing everyone else of placing politics over financial returns. The ESG vs a...

 

For a critical history of poverty finance: Placing neoliberalism in colonial capitalism

In this short blog post, I want to make the case for why a critical study of ‘poverty finance’ is crucial to understanding neoliberalism and its limits, following the publicati...

Comments

Leave a Response Cancel reply


Join our mailing list

© Progress in Political Economy (PPE)

Privacy | Designed by Nucleo | Terms and Conditions

  • Home
  • About
  • Manchester University Press Book Series
  • Past & Present Reading Group
  • A Political Economy of Australian Capitalism
  • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • JAPE Issues
    • JAPE Submission Guidelines
    • JAPE Young Scholar Award
  • Australian IPE Network (AIPEN)
  • Forums
    • Forums
    • Debating Anatomies of Revolution
    • Debating Debtfare States
    • Debating Economic Ideas in Political Time
    • Debating Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India
    • Debating Social Movements in Latin America
    • Debating The Making of Modern Finance
    • Debating War and Social Change in Modern Europe
    • Feminist Global “Secureconomy”
    • Gendered Circuits of Labour and Violence in Global Crises
    • Scandalous Economics
    • The Military Roots of Neoliberal Governance
    • Politicising artistic pedagogies
  • Literary Geographies of Political Economy
  • Pedagogy
    • Five Minute Honours Theses
    • Piketty Forum
    • Radical Economics Pedagogy
    • Unconventional Wisdom
    • Journal Club
    • Marxism Reading Group
  • Wheelwright Lecture
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Links
    • Political Economy At Sydney
    • PHD in Political Economy
    • Master of Political Economy
    • Centre for Future Work
    • Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ)
    • Climate Justice Research Centre (UTS)