nav-icons nav-icons
Progress in Political Economy (PPE) Progress in Political Economy (PPE)
LOGIN REGISTER
LOGIN
REGISTER
linklink
  • Home
  • About
  • Manchester University Press Book Series
  • Past & Present Reading Group
  • A Political Economy of Australian Capitalism
  • Australian IPE Network (AIPEN)
  • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • JAPE Submission Guidelines
    • JAPE Issues
    • JAPE Young Scholar Award
  • Other Reading Groups
    • The Rubicon Reading Group
    • Marxism Reading Group
    • Journal Club
  • Forums
    • Forums
    • Debating Anatomies of Revolution
    • Debating Debtfare States
    • Debating Economic Ideas in Political Time
    • Debating Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India
    • Debating The Making of Modern Finance
    • Debating War and Social Change in Modern Europe
    • Debating Social Movements in Latin America
    • Feminist Global “Secureconomy”
    • Scandalous Economics
    • The Military Roots of Neoliberal Governance
  • Literary Geographies of Political Economy
  • Pedagogy
    • Five Minute Honours Theses
    • Piketty Forum
    • Radical Economics Pedagogy
    • Unconventional Wisdom
  • Wheelwright Lecture
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Links
    • Political Economy At Sydney
    • PHD in Political Economy
    • Master of Political Economy
    • Centre for Future Work
    • Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ)
    • Climate Justice Research Centre (UTS)
Peter Thiel’s Zero to One explains why ‘big tech’ dominates
Previous
CfP Ships in the proletarian night: contemporary Marxist thought in France and Britain
Next

Rethinking Global Labour: A Rejoinder to Ronaldo Munck

Avatar
by Andreas Bieler on September 1, 2020

Rethinking Global Labour: A Rejoinder to Ronaldo Munck

Andreas Bieler | September 1, 2020

Tags: labour struggles
labour struggles
| 0 251

In an interesting reply by Ronaldo Munck to my review of his book Rethinking Global Labour he misunderstands the implications of my conceptual criticisms. Rather than pointing to my empirical work in the area of Global Labour Studies since 2008, I will make two conceptual points in response.

First, my criticism of Karl Polanyi has nothing to do with the debate of reformism = bad, revolution = good. All actions of resistance are to be welcomed. From an analytical point of view, however, it remains important to comprehend the historical specificity of capitalism, which allows us to understand the dynamics of particular moments of resistance. Polanyi is unable to do so due to his theoretical dualism between economy and social relations/civil society. Unsurprisingly, Polanyi is often referred to positively in liberal analyses of global developments. For a critical Global Labour Studies perspective, however, his work is a cul-de-sac in my view. In order to recognise that exploitation is always met by resistance and to appreciate the broad range of resistance movements with its various organisational and institutional expressions we need to go beyond Polanyi.

Second, of course, the focus is not on who interprets Marx correctly or to establish some kind of orthodox Marxism. Nevertheless, over the years, a number of distinctive rather different historical materialist positions have emerged through a critical engagement with Marx’s work. Some structuralist perspectives tend to over-emphasise the power of capital, while agency-focused perspectives such as autonomist Marxism over-estimate the role of labour. Critical Global Labour Studies scholars have to position themselves somewhere within this variety of conceptual stances. My problem with Munck’s choice of autonomist Marxism is the triumphalist assessments of the power of labour such agency-focused perspectives tend to adopt (see Bieler 2018). It is a triumphalism that is rarely justified by empirical reality. Munck reveals precisely the shortcomings of autonomist Marxism when he argues in his reply that ‘what Tronti and the autonomist or workerist current teaches us is that it is workers’ struggles that drive the course of capitalist development’ (Munck 2020).

Instead, in my joint work with Adam D. Morton in Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis, there is a critical engagement with contemporary Marxist perspectives, which emphasises the internal relations between class agency and the capitalist structuring conditions through a focus on class struggle. Here, it is understood that labour does not only operate within a particular structural setting, but it is also confronted with the systemic, competitive dynamics of capitalist social relations of production, which pushes capital towards constant outward expansion in order to survive. In other words, capitalist strategies are never only a response to workers’ resistance, as autonomist Marxism argues, but equally shaped by the systemic pressures of capitalist competition. This needs to be remembered when we engage in analysing today’s multiple forms of resistance.

In my forthcoming book, Fighting for Water: Resisting Privatisation in Europe (Zed Books, 2021), it is precisely this conceptual position which allows me to acknowledge fully the successful moments of resistance against water privatisation in Europe. Instead of falling into a triumphalist celebration of resistance, however, paying attention to capitalist structuring conditions equally allows me to understand why these successes have not always been fully implemented in concrete policies and why capital has continued to come back for another attempt at privatisation.

Share this post

  • Tweet
  • Share Post:

Avatar

Author: Andreas Bieler

Andreas Bieler is Professor of Political Economy at the University of Nottingham and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ).

Related Posts

 

Rethinking Global Labour: A Debate

I would like to thank Andreas Bieler for his interesting and engaged review of my recent book Rethinking Global Labour, optimistically titled After Neoliberalism and Adam David ...

 

Reflections on Rethinking Global Labour

In Rethinking Global Labour (Agenda Publishing, 2018), Ronaldo Munck has produced an important contribution to ongoing analyses of the potential role of global labour in shaping...

 

Cartographies of Baltic labour resistance

The conjuncture between the thirtieth anniversaries of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the USSR is an apt occasion to revisit the trajectories of change in...

 

Jack Mundey: Why the inspiration lives on

In the early 1970s Jack Mundey led a union of builders labourers that took strike action and imposed bans on developments that were then worth around $5 billion. At the time, Ja...

Comments

Leave a Response Cancel reply


Join our mailing list

© Progress in Political Economy (PPE)

Privacy | Terms and Conditions

  • Home
  • About
  • Manchester University Press Book Series
  • Past & Present Reading Group
  • A Political Economy of Australian Capitalism
  • Australian IPE Network (AIPEN)
  • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • Journal of Australian Political Economy (JAPE)
    • JAPE Submission Guidelines
    • JAPE Issues
    • JAPE Young Scholar Award
  • Other Reading Groups
    • The Rubicon Reading Group
    • Marxism Reading Group
    • Journal Club
  • Forums
    • Forums
    • Debating Anatomies of Revolution
    • Debating Debtfare States
    • Debating Economic Ideas in Political Time
    • Debating Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India
    • Debating The Making of Modern Finance
    • Debating War and Social Change in Modern Europe
    • Debating Social Movements in Latin America
    • Feminist Global “Secureconomy”
    • Scandalous Economics
    • The Military Roots of Neoliberal Governance
  • Literary Geographies of Political Economy
  • Pedagogy
    • Five Minute Honours Theses
    • Piketty Forum
    • Radical Economics Pedagogy
    • Unconventional Wisdom
  • Wheelwright Lecture
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Links
    • Political Economy At Sydney
    • PHD in Political Economy
    • Master of Political Economy
    • Centre for Future Work
    • Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ)
    • Climate Justice Research Centre (UTS)