Good talk, but too bad that 2/3 of the world was left out, i.e. China, India, Russia, etc. etc. etc. Also no discussion of imperialism when the world as of today looks to a fair degree like what Lenin described. How can one expect to understand the desires of the young man in Mumbai without understanding the history of colonial capitalism, in which the respective world positions of India and China changed from being centres of the world economy in 1500 to being very peripheral by 1900? How to explain wage differentials which are still huge between north and south? And why the omission of the ‘global South’ when that vast region now contains the majority of the global industrial work force? Why does China only enters as a negative meme about its current debt problems, or emerging markets as the centre of the next crisis? How can one explain this without reference to a theory of imperialism? A very good Eurocentric talk (in the best sense), but with lots of gaps, both in terms of world economy and of the role of progressive politics in the global South. Leads me to wonder was Syriza too bound by its ‘affection’ for and ‘identity’ with Europe to not develop a Plan B and perhaps, follow the Argentinian path?